RELIGION, POLITICS OF CONVERSIONS AND P K
It is not news that a movie has been well made or
scripted. News these days is whether it makes it to the 100 crores club or
breaks box office records. Politicians are less concerned by the ‘state of
welfare’, or any change thereof, of its ‘proletariat’, but more concerned with
their religious commitments or any changes thereof. This is not unexpected in a
nation obsessed with religion, and caste. Ever since I can remember, every
blessed form that I filled in, even prescription I wrote, carried the blanks
for religion and caste. This caste based distinction and segregation has pushed
the nation into an abyss, from which it is difficult to conceive how we will
extricate ourselves, if and when we are able to. Leaving the caste factor aside
before a thousand daggers are drawn against me, the boohoo about religion is
difficult to fathom.
To
many like me, religion is a very personal thing. Which God I believe in, or
don’t believe in for that matter, is entirely my preference, and should have,
and often does not have any bearing on what religion a person was born into or
bred up with. Religion is not just an amalgamation of ways of praying to the
Creator, of the forms in which he is visualized and worshiped, of what we
expect from Him, and how we go about pleading with Him it. Even what religion
means to each one may be vastly diverse and distinct. Does it then really
matter whether a person is Hindu or Muslim or Christian? He may be a Hindu but
atheist in practice, a Christian but celebrates like a Hindu. Does religion
actually give a Muslim any better life than if he was of any other religion? I
doubt if being a Sikh or Jain gives them anything more than a sense of
fraternity. Probably a bigger sense of oneness and inner peace would come if
everyone looked on the other as a fellow human being, and a creation of God.
Forget about who was who by way of religion, and who they should be or you want
them to be. Why are we so keen to welcome “Goa Christians to Hindu fold” and
undo what the Portuguese did so much earlier, or convert Muslims to Hindu
because the Mughals converted them centuries ago? Shakespeare’s words in the
form of Shylock’s outburst ring so true, notwithstanding the context. Let’s
just let them be mortal and human beings, God’s creation as they were meant to
be.
Love
produces many virtuosities. Apparently now, jihad is another offshoot. Love
jihad has now become a tactical issue, and Bajrang Dal plans a Hindutva
version, goading Hindu youth to marry Muslim girls. The end is very laudable in
that a universal brotherhood may emerge, but unfortunately the end is for all
the wrong reasons. At least here, in the words of the Mahatma, the end does not
justify the means.
Aamir
Khan’s “P K” has grossed 214 crores in first nine days. I have not seen the
film, but I doubt if this earning is totally attributable to his ‘excellent’
acting. The storyline seems fascinating. Some of the insinuations have caught
the attention of the audience because they do strike as being superfluous. That
there are similar insinuations and beliefs in all religions is obvious, but
conveniently forgotten by one faction and vehemently protested about by the
other. The audience of the film “P K “doesn’t give a damn, and the producers
are chuckling all the way to the bank. You wouldn’t mind about hurt sentiments
either, but for the fact that if the shoe was on the other foot, things would
be lot different, with burning cinema halls and may be a blood bath. It is
wiser to steer clear of any religious sentiment, as there are far more socially
relevant issues to debate and portray.
It is not for everyone that religion is
a nonentity.
Comments
Post a Comment